Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Opinion: The Supreme Court election of 2016

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Easton
    Posts
    574
    Thanks
    89
    Thanked 200 Times in 141 Posts

    Opinion: The Supreme Court election of 2016

    By Douglas Cohn and Eleanor Clift
    WASHINGTON Ė On January 20, 1801, President John Adams nominated his secretary of State, fellow Federalist John Marshall, to be chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Not only had Adams already been defeated for the presidency by Thomas Jefferson, his party would also soon fade away as well. But Marshall would remain head of the Court until 1835, proving that presidents come and go, but Supreme Court justices are there for life. Life, however, is fragile and uncertain, which is why some presidential elections are more significant than others when Supreme Court nominations are an issue. The election of 2016 will be one of those.
    By the time the next presidentís term of office expires in January 2021, the current Courtís members will have reached the following ages:
    Chief Justice John Roberts: a few days short of 66
    Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg: 87
    Associate Justice Antonin Scalia: 84
    Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy: 84
    Associate Justice Stephen Breyer: 82
    Associate Justice Clarence Thomas: 72
    Associate Justice Samuel Alito: 70
    Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor: 66
    Associate Justice Elena Kagan: 60
    From a strictly actuarial point of view, either President Obama and/or the next president will be making as many as four nominations, and the number could be higher depending upon the health of the justices.
    Those are the statistics. Here is the drama. This is a 5-4 Court, with five conservative members generally voting as block against the four progressive members, but too many 5-4 decisions undermine the Courtís credibility and authority. For example, a similar 5-4 Court inexplicably halted the Florida vote count in 2000, and effectively elected George W. Bush president.
    source

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    9,333
    Thanks
    3,036
    Thanked 1,285 Times in 959 Posts

    Re: Opinion: The Supreme Court election of 2016

    Quote Originally Posted by Aldomas View Post
    Those are the statistics. Here is the drama. This is a 5-4 Court, with five conservative members generally voting as block against the four progressive members, but too many 5-4 decisions undermine the Court’s credibility and authority. For example, a similar 5-4 Court inexplicably halted the Florida vote count in 2000, and effectively elected George W. Bush president.


    Major red flags of left-wing propaganda in this article.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Lancaster
    Posts
    21,942
    Thanks
    1,370
    Thanked 1,251 Times in 1,028 Posts

    Re: Opinion: The Supreme Court election of 2016

    Quote Originally Posted by Nativeson View Post
    Major red flags of left-wing propaganda in this article.[/INDENT]

    Red flags are to be expected when the left wingers pipe in .......

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Easton
    Posts
    574
    Thanks
    89
    Thanked 200 Times in 141 Posts

    Re: Opinion: The Supreme Court election of 2016

    You are correct. It seems everyone has an agenda.

    But red flags or no, the point remains that this next election could swing the court to a solid majority toward the right or toward the left.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Lancaster
    Posts
    21,942
    Thanks
    1,370
    Thanked 1,251 Times in 1,028 Posts

    Re: Opinion: The Supreme Court election of 2016

    If they got rid it the two totally unqualified justices the court would be all old farts

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •